Vol. 15 No. 02 (2025): Journal of Materials & Construction
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION

ISSN: 2734-9438

Website: www.jomc.vn

Reuse of phosphogypsum as a sustainable retarder in PCB40 cement production

Ho Viet Thang , Ngo Hoang Lan Anh , Nguyen Thi Ngoc Hien

Keywords:

Phosphogypsum
Natural gypsum
Cement
PCB40
Environment

Abstract

Vietnam faces a significant challenge due to its limited natural gypsum resources, which have been imported to meet the demand of cement production. Besides, the country is grappling with the environmental issue of thousands of tons of phosphogypsum waste discharged annually from Diammonium Phosphate (DAP) fertilizer production. This industrial byproduct poses substantial environmental concerns, highlighting an urgent need for sustainable waste management solutions. This study addresses these critical issues by reusing phosphogypsum as a sustainable alternative to natural gypsum in the manufacturing of PCB 40 cement. This work investigates the effect of varying phosphogypsum content, ranging from 1.5% to 5%, on cement properties, including standard water content, soundness, setting time, and compressive strength. To establish a comparative analysis, the experimental results were compared against a reference cement that incorporates 4% natural gypsum. The findings demonstrate that phosphogypsum can effectively substitute natural gypsum without compromising the quality or performance of the cement. Furthermore, the study confirms that cement produced with phosphogypsum consistently meets all established Vietnamese national standards for the examined properties. In an innovative step, the study also leveraged a 4th-degree polynomial regression model to predict the optimal phosphogypsum content. The model identified an optimal dosage of 3.5% phosphogypsum for maximizing compressive strength. The optimized 3.5% phosphogypsum formulation achieved a compressive strength of 58.3 MPa, which is 3% higher than that of the natural gypsum control. This prediction illustrated remarkable alignment with the experimental data, underscoring the potential of predictive modeling in cement production. This study paves a promising way in the reuse of phosphogypsum in construction materials, aiming at reducing impact on environment and sustainable development.

User Navigation

PDF

How to Cite

Ho Viet Thang, Ngo Hoang Lan Anh, & Nguyen Thi Ngoc Hien. (2025). Reuse of phosphogypsum as a sustainable retarder in PCB40 cement production. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION, 15(02), Page 103 – Page 111. https://doi.org/10.54772/jomc.v15i02.1136

References

  1. O. E. Ige, O. A. Olanrewaju, K. J. Duffy, and C. Obiora, “A review of the effectiveness of Life Cycle Assessment for gauging environmental impacts from cement production,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 324, p. 129213, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129213.
  2. L. J. McDonald, M. A. Carballo-Meilan, R. Chacartegui, and W. Afzal, “The physicochemical properties of Portland cement blended with calcium carbonate with different morphologies as a supplementary cementitious material,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 338, p. 130309, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130309.
  3. A. Papageorgiou, G. Tzouvalas, and S. Tsimas, “Use of inorganic setting retarders in cement industry,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 183–189, Feb. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.005.
  4. N. N. Lam, “A study on super-sulfated cement using Dinh Vu phosphogypsum,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 143, no. 1, p. 012016, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/143/1/012016.
  5. L. F. O. Silva et al., “A review on the environmental impact of phosphogypsum and potential health impacts through the release of nanoparticles,” Chemosphere, vol. 286, p. 131513, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131513.
  6. S. F. Lütke, M. L. S. Oliveira, L. F. O. Silva, T. R. S. Cadaval, and G. L. Dotto, “Nanominerals assemblages and hazardous elements assessment in phosphogypsum from an abandoned phosphate fertilizer industry,” Chemosphere, vol. 256, p. 127138, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127138.
  7. F. Akfas, A. Elghali, A. Aboulaich, M. Munoz, M. Benzaazoua, and J.-L. Bodinier, “Exploring the potential reuse of phosphogypsum: A waste or a resource?,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 908, p. 168196, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168196.
  8. G. M. S. Islam, F. H. Chowdhury, M. T. Raihan, S. K. S. Amit, and M. R. Islam, “Effect of Phosphogypsum on the Properties of Portland Cement,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 171, pp. 744–751, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.440.
  9. A. R. D. Costa, S. R. C. Matos, G. Camarini, and J. P. Gonçalves, “Hydration of sustainable ternary cements containing phosphogypsum,” Sustainable Materials and Technologies, vol. 28, p. e00280, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.susmat.2021.e00280.
  10. B. R. S. Calderón-Morales, A. García-Martínez, P. Pineda, and R. García-Tenório, “Valorization of phosphogypsum in cement-based materials: Limits and potential in eco-efficient construction,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 44, p. 102506, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102506.
  11. V. M. Pereira, R. H. Geraldo, T. A. M. Cruz, and G. Camarini, “Valorization of industrial by-product: Phosphogypsum recycling as green binding material,” Cleaner Engineering and Technology, vol. 5, p. 100310, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.clet.2021.100310.
  12. S. P. Raut, U. S. Patil, and M. V. Madurwar, “Utilization of phosphogypsum and rice husk to develop sustainable bricks,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 60, pp. 595–601, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.122.
  13. J. Zhou, H. Gao, Z. Shu, Y. Wang, and C. Yan, “Utilization of waste phosphogypsum to prepare non-fired bricks by a novel Hydration–Recrystallization process,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 34, pp. 114–119, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.045.
  14. J. A. P. Filho, H. C. Chaves, A. Ghermandi, A. J. G. Dias, D. de Carvalho, and J. P. Machado Ribeiro, “The use of phosphogypsum for soil bricks manufacturing as an alternative for its sustainable destination,” Arab J Geosci, vol. 16, no. 5, p. 305, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12517-023-11371-8.
  15. S. Oubaha, Y. Taha, M. Loutou, M. Oualid Mghazli, M. Benzaazoua, and R. Hakkou, “Fired brick production using phosphogypsum and phosphate mining waste,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 403, p. 133149, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133149.
  16. T. Sun et al., “A new eco-friendly concrete made of high content phosphogypsum based aggregates and binder: Mechanical properties and environmental benefits,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 400, p. 136555, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136555.
  17. Z. Liu, X. Qi, Y. Lv, and Z. Shui, “Application of Phosphogypsum in Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) Matrix for Strength Enhancement and Shrinkage Reduction,” Materials, vol. 18, no. 5, p. 1135, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.3390/ma18051135.
  18. N. Ngoc Lam, “Eco - concrete made with phosphogypsum-based super sulfated cement,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 869, no. 3, p. 032031, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/869/3/032031.
  19. C. Papastefanou, S. Stoulos, A. Ioannidou, and M. Manolopoulou, “The application of phosphogypsum in agriculture and the radiological impact,” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 188–198, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2006.05.005.
  20. L. Gao, R. Li, D. Yang, L. Bao, and N. Zhang, “Phosphogypsum improves soil and benefits crop growth: An effective measure for utilizing solid waste resources,” Sci Rep, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 11827, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97216-8.
  21. H. Gabsi et al., “Application of Phosphogypsum and Organic Amendment for Bioremediation of Degraded Soil in Tunisia Oasis: Targeting Circular Economy,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 4769, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15064769.
  22. R. P. Costa, M. H. G. de Medeiros, E. D. Rodriguez Martinez, V. A. Quarcioni, S. Suzuki, and A. P. Kirchheim, “Effect of soluble phosphate, fluoride, and pH in Brazilian phosphogypsum used as setting retarder on Portland cement hydration,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 17, p. e01413, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01413.