##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION

ISSN: 2734-9438

Website: www.jomc.vn

Recycled aluminum can fibers for concrete reinforcement: Standardized testing of compressive strength and static elastic modulus

Lam Thanh Quang Khai , Do Nguyen Ngoc Ha

Abstract

This study examines the feasibility of repurposing post-consumer aluminum beverage-can scrap into macro-fibers for concrete reinforcement as a pathway toward more sustainable construction materials. Although aluminum offers low density, inherent corrosion resistance in many environments, and abundant waste streams, data on concrete reinforced with fibers cut from recycled cans remain limited. Cleaned cans were slit into strips of 100 × 10 × 1 mm and added at a 2% fiber volume fraction to a B15 concrete. Cube compressive strength was determined on 150 mm cubes in accordance with TCVN 3118:2022, and the static modulus of elasticity was measured on 150 × 300 mm cylinders following TCVN 5726:2022. Measured moduli were also compared with code-based predictions from ACI 318-19, AS 3600:2018, BS 8110-2:1985, and Eurocode 2 (EN 1992-1-1). Relative to the plain control, the aluminum fiber–reinforced concrete exhibited ~22% lower cube strength (20.6 → 16.1 MPa) and ~11% lower modulus (23.99 → 21.31 GPa). The absolute differences between measured and code-predicted moduli were 5.8% (ACI), 11.3% (AS), 12.6% (BS), and 27.1% (EC2), indicating that current equations are not calibrated for concrete reinforced with recycled aluminum-can fibers. Compared with steel-fiber concrete, aluminum fibers did not enhance compressive strength but may offer benefits in post-cracking toughness, corrosion performance, and circularity. Recycled aluminum-can fibers appear feasible for non-structural or weight-sensitive concrete applications. Future work should optimize fiber geometry and dosage, improve dispersion and constructability, and include standardized flexural tests (ASTM C1609, EN 14651) to quantify post-cracking behavior.

References

  1. International Aluminium Institute, “Aluminium recycling and climate: energy and emissions benefits,” Report, 2024.
  2. ASTM International, ASTM C1609/C1609M-12: Standard Test Method for Flexural Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (Using Beam With Third-Point Loading), 2012.
  3. CEN, EN 14651:2005: Test method for metallic fibre concrete—Measuring the flexural tensile strength (LOP & residual), 2005.
  4. σ–ε design method,” Materials and Structures, 36, pp. 560–567, 2003, DOI: 10.1007/BF02480834
  5. Y. K. Sabapathy, S. Sabarish, C.N.A Nithish, S.M. Ramasamy, G. Krishna, “Experimental study on strength properties of aluminium fibre reinforced concrete,” Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences, 33(1), pp. 23–29, 2021, DOI: 10.1016/j.jksues.2019.12.004
  6. S. P. Muñoz Perez, J. M. Garcia Chumacero, S. Charca Mamani, and L. I. Villena Zapata, “Influence of the secondary aluminum chip on the physical and mechanical properties of concrete,” Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 8, art. 45, 2022, DOI: 10.1007/s41062-022-01015-3
  7. C. D. Agor, E. M. Mbadike, and G. U. Alaneme, “Evaluation of sisal fiber and aluminum waste concrete blend for sustainable construction using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system,” Scientific Reports, 13(1), art. 2814, 2023, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30008-0
  8. Elseknidy, M. H., Salmiaton, A., Nor Shafizah, I., & Saad, A. H. “A Study on Mechanical Properties of Concrete Incorporating Aluminum Dross, Fly Ash, and Quarry Dust”. Sustainability, 12(21), 9230, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/su12219230
  9. Abd El Haleem, S.M., El Wanees, S.A. & Farouk, A. Hydrogen Production on Aluminum in Alkaline Media. Prot Met Phys Chem Surf, 57, 906–916 (2021). DOI: 10.1134/S2070205121050099
  10. Mohamed Esaker, Georgia E. Thermou, Luis Neves, “Impact resistance of concrete and fibre-reinforced concrete: A review,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 180, 104722, 2023, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104722
  11. ACI Committee 318, ACI 318-19: Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, 2019.
  12. EN 1992-1-1:2004 (Eurocode 2): Design of Concrete Structures—General Rules and Rules for Buildings, 2004.
  13. Australian strandard, AS 3600:2018: Concrete Structures, 2018.
  14. British Standards Institution, BS 8110-2:1985: Structural Use of Concrete—Part 2: Code of Practice for Special Circumstances, 1985.
  15. C. Fernández-García, P. Padilla-Encinas, R. Fernández, M.C. Alonso, “Interaction of aluminum alloys with MKPC and Portland-based cements on the metal–matrix interface,” Applied Geochemistry, 172, 106105, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2024.106105
  16. H. Kinoshita, P. Swift, C. Utton, B. Carro-Mateo, G. Marchand, N. Collier, N. Milestone, “Corrosion of aluminium metal in OPC- and CAC-based cement matrices,” Cement and Concrete Research, 50, pp. 11–18, 2013, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.03.016
  17. Geng, H., Wei, Q., Ma, H., & Li, Q. “Inhibition Mechanism of Corrosion of Aluminium Alloy in Ordinary Portland Cement Paste by Polyaluminium Sulphate”. Ceramics, 8(1), 27. 2025. DO: 10.3390/ceramics8010027
  18. V. Testa, M. Gerardi, L. Zannini, M. Romagnoli, P.E. Santangelo, “Hydrogen production from aluminum reaction with NaOH/H2O solution: Experiments and insight into reaction kinetics,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 83, pp. 589-603, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.08.152
  19. T. Q. K. Lam, Q. K. Cao, H. H. Dao, T. T. Le, M. T. Vo, and T. K. Nguyen, “Effect of length and percentage of dispersed steel wire on compressive strength of concrete,” Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 456, pp. 391–403, 2024, DOI: 10.1007/978-981-99-9458-8_37