##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION

ISSN: 2734-9438

Website: www.jomc.vn

Factors influencing BIM adoption in construction project management in the Mekong Delta based on the TOE framework

Do Thi My Dung , Dao Huy Hoang , Huynh Han Phong

Abstract

Building Information Modeling (BIM) adoption in construction project management is influenced not only by technological readiness but also by organizational capacity and external environmental conditions. This study aims to assess the perceived factors influencing BIM adoption in civil and industrial construction project management in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam, using the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) framework. A questionnaire survey was conducted with 206 valid respondents, including clients, project management boards, design consultants, supervision consultants and contractors. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s Alpha reliability testing and mean score ranking. The results show that BIM adoption in the surveyed region remains at an early stage, with 66.0% of respondents reporting no BIM implementation and 34.0% indicating that their organizations are only exploring BIM. All TOE dimensions were perceived as highly influential. Environmental factors ranked first, followed by organizational and technological factors. The five highest-ranked sub-factors were client requirements, regional BIM ecosystem readiness, digital collaboration infrastructure, BIM regulations and standards, and competitive pressure. These findings indicate that, in the Mekong Delta, environmental and organizational conditions are perceived as more influential than technological characteristics alone. The study provides empirical evidence on BIM adoption in an emerging regional construction market and suggests that clients, policymakers and construction organizations should jointly promote BIM through clear requirements, standardized workflows, digital collaboration infrastructure and regional BIM capacity development.

References

  1. B. Succar, “Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders,” Automation in Construction, 18(3), 357–375, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.003.
  2. S. Azhar, “Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry,” Leadership and Management in Engineering, 11(3), 241–252, 2011. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000127.
  3. D. Bryde, M. Broquetas, and J.M. Volm, “The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM),” International Journal of Project Management, 31(7), 971–980, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.001.
  4. N. Gu and K. London, “Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry,” Automation in Construction, 19(8), 988–999, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.002.
  5. R. Eadie, M. Browne, H. Odeyinka, C. McKeown, and S. McNiff, “BIM implementation throughout the UK construction project lifecycle: An analysis,” Automation in Construction, 36, 145–151, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2013.09.001.
  6. E. Alreshidi, M. Mourshed, and Y. Rezgui, “Factors for effective BIM governance,” Journal of Building Engineering, 10, 89–101, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.02.006.
  7. R. Ahuja, M. Jain, A. Sawhney, and M. Arif, “Adoption of BIM by architectural firms in India: Technology–organization–environment perspective,” Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 12(4), 311–330, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/17452007.2016.1186589.
  8. R. Ahuja, A. Sawhney, M. Jain, M. Arif, and S. Rakshit, “Factors influencing BIM adoption in emerging markets: The case of India,” International Journal of Construction Management, 20(1), 65–76, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2018.1462445.
  9. Y. Chen, Y. Yin, G.J. Browne, and D. Li, “Adoption of building information modeling in Chinese construction industry,” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(9), 1878–1898, 2019. DOI: 10.1108/ECAM-11-2017-0246.
  10. X. Qin, Y. Shi, K. Lyu, and Y. Mo, “Using a TAM–TOE model to explore factors of Building Information Modelling (BIM) adoption in the construction industry,” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 26(3), 259–277, 2020. DOI: 10.3846/jcem.2020.12176.
  11. N.V. Tam, T.N. Diep, N.Q. Toan, and N.L.D. Quy, “Factors affecting adoption of building information modeling in construction projects: A case of Vietnam,” Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1918848, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2021.1918848.
  12. L.H. Nam, V.T.K. Dung, H.V. Giang, and D.N. Cang, “BIM for infrastructure projects in Vietnam: Status quo, obstacles for the application and solutions,” Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering, 12(1), 53–64, 2018. DOI: 10.31814/stce.nuce2018-12(1)-07.
  13. D.T.H. Duyen, N.V. Tam, N.V. Yen, and L.T.H. An, “BIM-based quantity take-off, experience of foreign countries,” Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering, 12(1), 46–52, 2018. DOI: 10.31814/stce.nuce2018-12(1)-06.
  14. D.H. Hoang, N.Q. Tuan, T.D. Quang, “Proposed the application of building information modeling (bim) in quantity surveying for construction works in vietnam,” Journal of Science, Technology and Engineering Mien Tay Construction University, (1), 54–62, 2022.
  15. L.D.T. Tin, D.T. Sy, and N.T. Viet, “Identifying the barriers to the implementing of BIM-nD in construction project management,” Journal of Materials and Construction, 14(06), 112–117, 2024. DOI: 10.54772/jomc.06.2024.804.

Most read articles by the same author(s)