##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION

ISSN: 2734-9438

Website: www.jomc.vn

The pounding mitigation techniques in adjacent structures due to earthquakes

Tam Doan Kieu Van

Abstract

Investigations of past and recent earthquake damage have illustrated that the building structures are vulnerable to severe damage or collapse during moderate to strong ground motion. Among the possible structural damages, seismic induced pounding has been commonly observed in several earthquakes. Adjacent buildings during an earthquake may collide against each other when, owing to their different dynamic characteristics, the building vibrate out of phase and the at-rest separation distance is inadequate to accommodate their relative motion. When impact loads from pounding are too high, the structural system has to be modified to reduce the response. This research work covers the mitigation of pounding between adjacent structures due to earthquakes. The methods may be classified according to their approach to the problem of pounding: Methods to avoid pounding; Methods to increase the stiffness of building; Methods to supplement energy dissipation;  Methods to impact absorb material.

References

  1. . Abdel, R. and E. Shehata. Seismic Pounding between Adjacent Building Structures, Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, 2006, 66-74.
  2. . Naserkhaki C., Rich M. E., Abdul Aziz F. N. A., Pourmohammad H., Separation Gap, A Critical Factor in Earthquake Induced Pounding between Adjacent Buildings., Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2013, 14, 881-898.
  3. . Anagnostopoulos S. A., Pounding of buildings in series during earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering, 1998, 16, 443-456.
  4. . Rosenbluth E. and Meli R., The 1985 earthquake: causes and effects in Mexico City, Concrete International (ACI),, 1986, 8, 23-36.
  5. . Kasai K., Maison B. F., Building pounding damage during the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake, Engineering Structures, 1997, 19, 195-207.
  6. . Agarwal V. K, Niedzwecki J. M, Van de Lindt J. W., Earthquake induced pounding in friction varying base isolated buildings, Engineering Structures, 2007, 29, 2825-2832.
  7. . Chau K. T., Wei X. X., Shen C.Y., Wang L.X., Experimental and theoretical simulations of seismic torsional poundings between two adjacent structures, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C, 2004.
  8. . Efraimiadou S., Hatzigeorgiou G. D., Beskos D.E., Structural pounding between adjacent buildings subjected to strong ground motions, Part I: The effect of different structures arrangement, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn, 2013, 42, 1509–1528.
  9. . Efraimiadou S., Hatzigeorgiou G. D., Beskos D.E., Structural pounding between adjacent buildings subjected to strong ground motions, Part II: The effect of multiple earthquakes, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn, 2013, 42, 1529–1545.
  10. . Francisco L. A. and Alireza K., Parametric study of the pounding effect between adjacent rc buildings with aligned slabs, Second European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, 2014.
  11. . Jankowski R. Mahmoud S., Earthquake-Induced Structural Pounding, Springer International Publishing, 2015.
  12. . Puneeth Kumar M. S., Karuna S., Effect of seismic pounding between adjacent buildings and mitigation measures, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 2015, 4(7), 208-216.
  13. . Naderpour H. R., Barros C., Khatami S. M., Jankowski R., Numerical Study on Pounding between Two Adjacent Buildings under Earthquake Excitation, Shock and Vibration, 2016, 1-9.
  14. . Namboothiri, V. P., Seismic Pounding of Adjacent Buildings, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) 2017, 4(3), 1443-1448.
  15. . Lopez Garcia, D., Effect of restrainers to mitigate pounding between adjacent decks subjected to a strong ground motion, Proceeding of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2004.
  16. . Malhotra, A., D. Carson and R. Pall., Friction Dampers for Upgrade of St. Vincent hospital, Ottawa, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2004.
  17. . Plumier,A., C. Doneux, V. Caporaletti, F. Ferrario, D. Stoica., Guide Technique Parasismique Belge Pour Maisons Individuelles, L’Universite de Liege – Belgium, 2005.
  18. . Shoushtari, A. V., Seismic behavior of tall building structures by friction damper, MSc Thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Technology, Malaysia, 2005.
  19. . Y.L. Xu, J.M. Ko, Dynamic response of damper-Connected adjacent building under earthquake excitation, Engineering Structures, 1999.
  20. . Elsalam S.A, Eraky Atef., Control of adjacent isolated-buildings pounding using viscous dampers, Journal of American Science, 2012, 12, 1251-1259.
  21. . Sorace S, Terenzi G, Damped Interconnection-Based Mitigation of Seismic Pounding between Adjacent R/C Buildings, International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2013, 5, 406-412.
  22. . Kajita Y., Kitahara T., Nishimoto Y., Otsuka H., Estimation of maximum impact force on natural rubber during collision of two steel bars, First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (1st ECEES), 2006.
  23. . Polycarpou P. C., Komodromos P., Simulating the use of rubber shock absorbers for mitigating poundings of seismically isolated buildings during strong earthquakes, 2nd International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2009.
  24. . Polycarpou P. C., Komodromos P., A parametric study for the investigation of the effectiveness of rubber shock-absorbers as a mitigation measure for earthquake-induced structural poundings, 3rd ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2011.
  25. . Polycarpou P. C., Komodromos P., Numerical investigation of potential mitigation measures for poundings of seismically isolated buildings, Journal of Earthquake and Structures, 2011, 2(1), 1-24.