##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION

ISSN: 2734-9438

Website: www.jomc.vn

Exploring the potential benefits of 3D printing technology in laboratory equipment: Case studies on custom lab equipment and components

Huynh Nguyen Ngoc Tri , Thien Nguyen Thanh

Abstract

Although 3D printers are becoming more common in households, they are still under-represented in many laboratories worldwide. However, this paper highlights the potential benefits of 3D printing technology in laboratory equipment. Researchers and scientists may need to learn about the potential benefits of 3D printing technology. It is essential to note that 3D printers are not just toys. They can be valuable tools for laboratory equipment, creating custom lab equipment and components, which can be difficult or expensive to obtain through traditional means. 3D printing can save time and money while increasing research efficiency. Also, 3D printers can create complex structures and models that help visualize and understand scientific concepts and create prototypes of new inventions and ideas. This study explores two examples of using 3D printing techniques, including a 3D printer-created pipette tip sorting device and a specific mold for sand samples in biocementation. The application and errors, mistakes, and challenges in materials control, with suitable solutions, were also discussed. Although 3D printers may still need to become as standard in laboratories as other types of equipment, their potential applications make them a valuable addition to any research or development team.

References

  1. . Baden, T., Chagas, A.M., Gage, G., Marzullo, T., Prieto-Godino, L.L., Euler, T.: Open Labware: 3-D printing your own lab equipment. PLoS biology. 13, e1002086 (2015).
  2. . Waheed, S., Cabot, J.M., Macdonald, N.P., Lewis, T., Guijt, R.M., Paull, B., Breadmore, M.C.: 3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers. Lab on a Chip. 16, 1993–2013 (2016).
  3. . Xu, J., Johnson, J.S., Birgegård, A., Jordan, J., Kennedy, M.A., Landén, M., Maguire, S.L., Martin, N.G., Mortensen, P.B., Petersen, L.V.: Exploring the clinical consequences and genetic aetiology of adult weight trajectories. MedRxiv. 2021–10 (2021).
  4. . Colella, R., Chietera, F.P., Catarinucci, L.: Analysis of FDM and DLP 3D-printing technologies to prototype electromagnetic devices for RFID applications. Sensors. 21, 897 (2021).
  5. . Koch, F., Thaden, O., Tröndle, K., Zengerle, R., Zimmermann, S., Koltay, P.: Open-source hybrid 3D-bioprinter for simultaneous printing of thermoplastics and hydrogels. HardwareX. 10, e00230 (2021).
  6. . Del Rosario, M., Heil, H.S., Mendes, A., Saggiomo, V., Henriques, R.: The field guide to 3D printing in optical microscopy for life sciences. Advanced Biology. 6, 2100994 (2022).
  7. . Carmi, Y., Geva, I.: Automatic machine for loading pipette tips into a rack and a loading method thereof, (2008).
  8. . Wilson, M.A., Carter, M.A., Hall, C., Hoff, W.D., Ince, C., Savage, S.D., McKay, B., Betts, I.M.: Dating fired-clay ceramics using long-term power law rehydroxylation kinetics. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 465, 2407–2415 (2009).
  9. . Li, L., Amini, F., Zhao, Q., Li, C., Wen, K., Li, M., Ogbonnaya, U.: Development of a flexible mold for bio-mediated soil materials. In: IFCEE 2015. pp. 2339–2348 (2015).
  10. . Huynh, N.N.T., Tu, T.A., Huyen, N.P.H., Son, N.K.: Lab-scale experiments for soil cementing through bio-chemical process. ASEAN Engineering Journal. 11, 255–265 (2021). https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v11.18043.
  11. . Omoregie, A.I., Muda, K., Ong, D.E.L., Ojuri, O.O., Bakri, M.K.B., Rahman, M.R., Basri, H.F., Ling, Y.E.: Soil bio-cementation treatment strategies: state-of-the-art review. Geotechnical Research. 40, 1–25 (2023).