ISSN: 2734-9438
Website: www.jomc.vn
Recycling waste Nix particles for ultra-high-performance concrete: A practical way towards the sustainability
Abstract
Research on Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) has demonstrated the feasibility of utilizing various types of industrial and agricultural waste to partially substitute cement or aggregates. Researchers have focused on using waste materials as mineral admixtures to substitute cement in UHPC. However, sand, the main ingredient, constitutes a significant proportion in UHPC, i.e. about 50% of the mass of concrete, thus the use of sand with a high volume can adversely affect natural resources and increase costs. This paper investigates the possibility of using Nix particle waste from ship cleaning to partially or completely substitute quartz sand in UHPC. Experimental results show that Nix particle waste has been cleaned with an average particle size of about 300 µm can be used to produce UHPC with high flowability, compressive strength above 120 MPa, and high chloride ion penetration resistance. Life cycle assessment of concrete mixes reveal that using Nix particles to substitute sand improves the environmental performance of concrete, as shown by a reduction in all six environmental impact assessment indicators. Although the reduction level is not large, only ranging from 0.95 to 6.44% depending on each indicator, it brings socio-economic benefits thanks to utilizing waste, reducing waste treatment activities, and resource efficiency as uses natural sand in large quantities.
References
- Fehling, E., et al., Ultra-High Performance Concrete UHPC: Fundamentals, Design, Examples, ed. Beton-Kalender. Berlin, Germany: Ernst & Sohn, 2013.
- Fehling, E., M. Schmidt, and S. Stürwald, “Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC)”, in Proceedings of Second International Symposium on Ultra High Performance Concrete. Kassel, Germany: Unidruckerei, University of Kassel, 2008.
- Richard, P. and M.H. Cheyrezy, “Reactive Powder concretes with high ductility and 200-800 MPa compressive strength”, ACI Special Publication, 144:507–518, 1994. DOI: 10.14359/4536.
- Richard, P. and M.H. Cheyrezy, “Composition of reactive powder concretes”, Cement and Concrete Research, 25(7):1501–1511, 1995. DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00144-2.
- AFGC-SETRA, Ultra High Performance Fibre-Reinforced Concretes (UHPFRC)-State of the Art. AFGC Publication, Paris, France, 2002.
- Ma, J. and H. Schneider, “Properties of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete”, Leipzig Annual Civil Engineering Report (LACER), 7:25–32, 2002.
- Gursel, A. and C. Ostertag, Life-Cycle Assessment of High-Strength Concrete Mixtures with copper slag as sand replacement. Advances in Civil Engineering, 6815348, 2019.
- Shi, C., C. Meyer, and A. Behnood, “Utilization of copper slag in cement and concrete. Resources”, Conservation and Recycling, 52(10):1115–1120, 2008.
- Dey, A., et al., “Use of copper slag as sustainable aggregate”, Icsci, 1:229–240, 2014.
- Edwin, R.S., et al., Effect of secondary copper slag as cementitious material in ultra-high performance mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 119: 31–44, 2016.
- ASTM C1437, Standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar, in Book of Standards Volume: 04.01. 2020.
- ASTM C1202:19, Test method for electrical indication of concrete’s ability to resist chloride ion penetration.
- Nguyen, V.T., Nguyen, C.T., Pham, H.H., “Sustainable development of ultra-high strength concrete using mineral admixtures to partly replace cement in Vietnam”, Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering, 24/2015:11–18, 2015.
- Nguyen, C.T., et al., “Ultra high performance concrete using a combination of Silicafume and Ground Granulated Blast-furnace Slag in Vietnam”, in the Proceedings of the international Conference on Sustainable Built Environment for Now and the Future, Hanoi: pp. 303–309, 2013.
- Roux, N., Andrade, C., and Sanjuan, M.A., “Experimental Study of Durability of Reactive Powder Concretes”, ASCE Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 8(1):1–6, 1996.
- Council, U.S.G.B., LEED: Leadership in energy and environmental design. Washington, DC: US Green Building Council, 2005.
- https://ecoinvent.org/. Website accessed April, 24, 2024.
- ACERO, et al., LCIA methods. Impact assessment methods in Life Cycle Assessment and their impact categories, 2016.