Vol. 14 No. 02 (2024): Journal of Materials and Construction
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION

ISSN: 2734-9438

Website: www.jomc.vn

A REVIEW OF STUDIES ON CONSTRUCTION INVESTMENT PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT USING SEM MODEL

Van Thuan Do , Thi Tuyet Dung Nguyen , Dang Quang Dinh , Thi Hang Nga Hoang , Thi Phuong Nguyen

Keywords:

Risk
Risk management
Project
Project management
SEM

Abstract

Construction investment activities involve numerous risks, both during construction and operation phases. Some risks recur frequently across multiple projects, while others have a lower probability of occurrence. SEM is one of the optimal methods for assessing a project's performance under risk conditions. Globally, there are numerous studies on construction investment project risk management using SEM. In Vietnam, while SEM has been applied in fields such as biology, sociology, psychology, medicine, business, and education, its application in the construction sector remains limited. This paper reviews scientific studies on construction investment project risk management using SEM both domestically and internationally, identifies limitations in the application of this model in Vietnam, and aims to provide managers with a comprehensive overview of this modern multivariate analysis technique.

User Navigation

How to Cite

Do, V. T., Nguyen, T. T. D., Dinh, D. Q., Hoang, T. H. N., & Nguyen, T. P. (2024). A REVIEW OF STUDIES ON CONSTRUCTION INVESTMENT PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT USING SEM MODEL . JOURNAL OF MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION, 14(02). https://doi.org/10.54772/jomc.v14i02.807

References

  1. . Le, A. D., & Bui, M. H. (2015). Risk management in construction enterprises (Monograph). Construction Publishing House, Hanoi.
  2. . Mukhtar A. Kassem (2022), Risk Management Assessment in Oil and Gas Construction Projects Using Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM),Gases 2022, 2, 33–60.
  3. . Shahid Hussain, ID , Zhu Fangwei, Ahmed Faisal Siddiqi, Zaigham Ali and Muhammad Salman Shabbir (2018), Structural Equation Model for Evaluating Factors Affecting Quality of Social Infrastructure Projects, Sustainability 2018, 10, 1415.
  4. . Adedokun, O. and Egbelakin, T. (2022), "Structural equation modelling of risk factors influencing the success of building projects", Journal of Facilities Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-01-2022-0002.
  5. . Murat Gunduz (2020), Critical assessment of construction contract administration using fuzzy structural equation modeling,Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management Vol. 27 No. 6, 2020 pp. 1233-1255.
  6. . Azariy Lapidus , Ivan Abramov , Tatyana Kuzmina , Anastasiia Abramova and Zaid Ali Kadhim AlZaidi (2023), Sustainable Activity of Construction Companies under the Influence of Destabilizing Factors on the Duration of Implementation of Investment and Construction Projects, Preprints (www.preprints.org), 14 September 2023.
  7. . Ali Foroutan Mirhosseini , Kelly Pitera , James Odeck, and Morten Welde (2022), Sustainable Project Management: Reducing the Risk of Cost Inaccuracy Using a PLS-SEM Approach, Sustainability 2022, 14, 960. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su14020960.
  8. . Dedong Wang, Shaoze FANG , Hongwei FU (2019), The Effectiveness Of Evolutionary Governance In Mega Construction Projects: A Moderated Mediation Model Of Relational Contract And Transaction Cost, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management ISSN 1392-3730/eISSN 1822-3605, 2019 Tập 25 Số 4: 340–352.
  9. . Aftab Hameed Memon, Abdul Qadir Memon, Mohsin Ali Soomro, Muneeb Ayub Memon, Jam Shahzeb Khan Sahito (2023), Structural model of cost overrun factors affecting Pakistani construction projects, Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology.
  10. . Yaser Gamil (2019), Studying the relationship between causes and effects of poor communication in construction projects using PLS-SEM approach, Journal of Facilities Management Vol. 21 No. 1, 2023 pp. 102-148.
  11. . Muhammad Abdul Rehmana and Md Sayuti Bin Ishak (2023), Moderation role of government acts, laws and policies between economic factors and risk management: A case study of Saudi Arabia contractors, Journal of Project Management 8 (2023) 213–226.
  12. . Nguyen, T. L., & Nguyen, T. T. V. (2012). The spreading effect model in the construction industry in Soc Trang province. Can Tho University Journal of Science.
  13. . Tran, Q. T., & Do, T. S. (2021). Establishing a risk map in the construction phases of high-rise buildings in Vietnam. The Builder Magazine.
  14. . Hoang, V. P., & Long, T. D. (2021). Building a system dynamics support model and risk management in the preparation phase of high-rise building projects for investors in Ho Chi Minh City. Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology Journal.
  15. . Le, A. M. T., Bui, V. T., & Pham, M. T. (2022). Factors affecting the delay in capital disbursement of projects in Can Tho City. Commerce and Industry Magazine, 14(6).
  16. . Nguyen, A. T., & Vo, D. K. (2021). Assessing the impact of design-phase risks on project performance in design-build projects in Vietnam. The Builder Magazine, 3&4.
  17. . Pham, H. L., & Pham, V. L. (2021). The relationship between factors affecting project appraisal and post-foundation design of construction agencies. The Builder Magazine, 11.