##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION

ISSN: 2734-9438

Website: www.jomc.vn

Developing a multi-tiered decision-making framework for screening fdi construction projects in Vietnam: Integrating lean, green, and circular approaches toward Net-Zero 2050

Nguyen Anh Duc

Abstract

Vietnam's pledge to attain net-zero emissions by 2050 requires effective strategies to assess the sustainability of foreign direct investment (FDI) construction projects.  This study introduces a multi-tiered decision-making framework that integrates lean construction, green building, and circular economy ideas into a unified assessment tool.  Eight pilot FDI projects, representing four primary FDI categories: Food & Beverage Processing Facilities, Electronics & Tech Manufacturing Plants, High-Rise Residential/Mixed-Use Buildings, and Commercial/Industrial Parks, are used to deduce weights in multiple linear regression.  Three other projects were assessed to verify the framework's prediction precision.  Results demonstrate that elevated index scores are associated with enhanced resource efficiency, reduced carbon footprints, and superior waste management techniques.  A tier classification system (Platinum, Gold, Silver, Bronze) provides explicit benchmarks for politicians and investors, aiding in the allocation of incentives and promoting ongoing enhancement.  This approach customizes lean, green, and circular tactics to local contexts, aligning foreign direct investment projects with Vietnam's decarbonization path and offering a pragmatic model for evaluating construction proposals in developing countries.

References

  1. T. X. P. Nguyen, “Green Economic Development: International Lessons for Vietnam,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Economics and Finance, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 201–212, 2023, doi: 10.55057/ijaref.2023.5.2.19.
  2. D. T. Pham, H. Van Pham, and T. Q. Dang, “Renewable Energy Consumption, Energy Efficiency, Trade, Economic Development and FDI on Climate Change in Vietnam,” International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, vol. 13, no. 6, 2023, doi: 10.32479/ijeep.14571.
  3. C. C. Müller, P. Pradhananga, and M. ElZomor, “Pathways to Decarbonization, Circular Construction, and Sustainability in the Built Environment,” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2024, doi: 10.1108/ijshe-09-2023-0400.
  4. X. Meng, “Lean Management in the Context of Construction Supply Chains,” Int J Prod Res, 2019, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1566659.
  5. A. Banawi and M. M. Bilec, “A Framework to Improve Construction Processes: Integrating Lean, Green and Six Sigma,” International Journal of Construction Management, 2014, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2013.875266.
  6. G. Sun, M. Li, J. Dong, S. Wan, and J. Feng, “Evaluation of Key Factors for Promoting Green Construction Practices Based on a Hybrid Decision-Making Framework: A Case Study on the Renovation of Old Residential Communities in China,” Axioms, 2023, doi: 10.3390/axioms12100971.
  7. P. Santos et al., “Circular Material Usage Strategies and Principles in Buildings: A Review,” Buildings, 2024, doi: 10.3390/buildings14010281.
  8. R. Charef, J. Morel, and K. Rakhshan, “Barriers to Implementing the Circular Economy in the Construction Industry: A Critical Review,” Sustainability, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132312989.
  9. M. Fahmy, “Lean Principles Implementation in Construction Management: A One Team Approach,” 2020, doi: 10.29117/cic.2020.0034.
  10. S. Yang, “Application of Bim During Lean Construction of High-Rise Buildings,” Stavební Obzor - Civil Engineering Journal, 2019, doi: 10.14311/cej.2019.03.0027.
  11. K. Madson, B. Franz, R. Leicht, and J. Nelson, “Evaluating the Sustainability of New Construction Projects over Time by Examining the Evolution of the LEED Rating System,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 22, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su142215422.
  12. O. A. Marzouk, “Zero Carbon Ready Metrics for a Single-Family Home in the Sultanate of Oman Based on EDGE Certification System for Green Buildings,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 15, no. 18, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151813856.
  13. D. T. Doan, H. Van Tran, I. E. Aigwi, N. Naismith, A. Ghaffarianhoseini, and A. Ghaffarianhoseini, “Green building rating systems: A critical comparison between LOTUS, LEED, and Green Mark,” Environ Res Commun, vol. 5, no. 7, 2023, doi: 10.1088/2515-7620/ace613.
  14. S. Altomonte and S. Schiavon, “Occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings,” Build Environ, vol. 68, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.06.008.
  15. C. Gillott, W. Mihkelson, M. Lanau, D. Cheshire, and D. D. Tingley, “Developing Regenerate: A Circular Economy Engagement Tool for the Assessment of New and Existing Buildings,” J Ind Ecol, 2023, doi: 10.1111/jiec.13377.
  16. X. Meng, S. Das, and J. Meng, “Integration of Digital Twin and Circular Economy in the Construction Industry,” Sustainability, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151713186.
  17. J. G. I Sarhan, B. Xia, S. Fawzia, A. Karim, A. O. Olanipekun, and V. Coffey, “Framework for the Implementation of Lean Construction Strategies Using the Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) Technique,” Engineering Construction & Architectural Management, 2019, doi: 10.1108/ecam-03-2018-0136.
  18. M. Behún and A. Behúnová, “Advanced Innovation Technology of BIM in a Circular Economy,” Applied Sciences, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13137989.
  19. R. Minunno, T. O’Grady, G. M. Morrison, and R. L. Gruner, “Exploring environmental benefits of reuse and recycle practices: A circular economy case study of a modular building,” Resour Conserv Recycl, vol. 160, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104855.