##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION

ISSN: 2734-9438

Website: www.jomc.vn

Partial replacement of natural sand with recycled waste oyster shells in concrete production of grade 30 MPA

Ho Viet Thang , Tran Thi Thanh Phuong , Le Thi Ngoc Quy

Abstract

In the construction industry, concrete is a vital material, and natural sand is an essential aggregate component. However, natural sand resources are currently becoming increasingly scarce due to excessive exploitation. Furthermore, oyster shells, a waste product from aquaculture and seafood processing, are difficult to decompose and contribute to environmental pollution. Consequently, investigating the utilization of finely crushed waste oyster shells to partially substitute natural sand in concrete production represents a promising and necessary approach, simultaneously mitigating pollution and effectively utilizing available waste streams. In the present study, oyster shells were finely ground and used to replace natural sand at substitution ratios ranging from 5% to 20%. The results, based on measurements of slump, compressive strength, and water absorption of the concrete, conducted in accordance with Vietnamese standards, indicate that the crushed shell is capable of replacing up to 15% of the natural sand while maintaining the requisite properties and technical specifications of the concrete.

References

  1. S. Hasdemir, A. Tuğrul, and M. Yılmaz, “The effect of natural sand composition on concrete strength,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 112, pp. 940–948, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.188.
  2. S. Mundra, P. R. Sindhi, V. Chandwani, R. Nagar, and V. Agrawal, “Crushed rock sand – An economical and ecological alternative to natural sand to optimize concrete mix,” Perspectives in Science, vol. 8, pp. 345–347, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.pisc.2016.04.070.
  3. A. Torres et al., “Sustainability of the global sand system in the Anthropocene,” One Earth, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 639–650, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.011.
  4. C. Jordan et al., “Sand mining in the Mekong Delta revisited - current scales of local sediment deficits,” Sci Rep, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 17823, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53804-z.
  5. R. K. K. Chow, S. W. S. Yip, and A. K. H. Kwan, “Processing crushed rock fine to produce manufactured sand for improving overall performance of concrete,” HKIE Transactions, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 240–249, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1080/1023697X.2013.861186.
  6. S. C. Boobalan, V. Gayathri, G. Shyamala, D. Maruthachalam, and S. Rani, “Performance of sustainable concrete with crushed rock fines–A Review,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 981, no. 3, p. 032065, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/981/3/032065.
  7. A. Agrawal and N. Malviya, “Integrating artificial intelligence to optimize quarry dust replacement in concrete for enhanced strength and sustainability,” Next Research, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 100824, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.nexres.2025.100824.
  8. E. E. Ali and S. H. Al-Tersawy, “Recycled glass as a partial replacement for fine aggregate in self compacting concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 35, pp. 785–791, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.117.
  9. M. Dadouch, T. Belal, and M. S. Ghembaza, “Valorization of glass waste as partial substitution of sand in concrete – Investigation of the physical and mechanical properties for a sustainable construction,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 411, p. 134436, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134436.
  10. Z. Z. Ismail and E. A. AL-Hashmi, “Recycling of waste glass as a partial replacement for fine aggregate in concrete,” Waste Management, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 655–659, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.08.012.
  11. N. V. Quang, T. T. Binh, and N. T. Anh, “Mariculture development in Vietnam: Present status and prospects,” The VMOST Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 11–20, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.31276/VMOSTJOSSH.65(3).11-20.
  12. P. Bellei, I. Torres, R. Solstad, and I. Flores-Colen, “Potential Use of Oyster Shell Waste in the Composition of Construction Composites: A Review,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 6, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.3390/buildings13061546.
  13. T. H. Silva, J. Mesquita-Guimarães, B. Henriques, F. S. Silva, and M. C. Fredel, “The Potential Use of Oyster Shell Waste in New Value-Added By-Product,” Resources, vol. 8, no. 1, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.3390/resources8010013.
  14. B. Bunyamin and A. Mukhlis, “Utilization of Oyster Shells as A Substitute Part of Cement and Fine Aggregate in the Compressive Strength of Concrete,” AIJST, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 150–156, 2020, doi: 10.13170/aijst.9.3.17761.
  15. H.-Y. Chen, L. G. Li, Z. Lai, A. K. H. Kwan, P. Chen, and P. L. Ng, “Effects of Crushed Oyster Shell on Strength and Durability of Marine Concrete Containing Fly Ash and Blastfurnace Slag,” Materials Science, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 97–107, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.5755/j01.ms.25.1.18772.
  16. O. A. Ubachukwu, F. O. Okafor, K. B. Nwokoukwu, and K. P. Esochaghi, “Performance of Sand-Crushed Oyster Shells Blended Fine Aggregates in Concrete: Waste Management Perspective in Nigeria,” Nigerian Journal of Technology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 13–18, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.4314/njt.v40i1.3.
  17. Y. Liao, X. Wang, L. Wang, Z. Yin, B. Da, and D. Chen, “Effect of waste oyster shell powder content on properties of cement-metakaolin mortar,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 16, p. e01088, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01088.
  18. H. N. Ruslan, K. Muthusamy, N. F. Ariffin, M. M. Abdul Wahab, and N. Mohamad, “Effect of crushed cockle shell as partial fine aggregate replacement on workability and strength of lightweight concrete,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 48, pp. 1826–1830, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.140.
  19. X. Wang et al., “Effect of biological shells aggregate on the mechanical properties and sustainability of concrete,” Sci Rep, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 10615, May 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61301-1.