##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##
Tạp chí Vật liệu & Xây dựng - Bộ Xây dựng

ISSN:

Website: www.jomc.vn

Normalizing bid discount rates in construction procurement by package scale and contract duration in Ho Chi Minh city

Lê Thị Thanh Trâm

Abstract

This paper proposes a two-dimensional normalization framework for bid discount rates in civil-works procurement along package scale (S) and contract duration (T). Using a dataset of 201 construction packages in Ho Chi Minh City (2023-2024), we stratify observations by tertiles to form an SXT matrix and compile P25-P50-P75 percentile benchmarks for each cell. The methodology combines robust statistics (median, interquartile range) with the Kruskal-Wallis test and epsilon-squared (ε²) effect size to ensure inferences that are stable under skewness and outliers. Results show that, when each dimension is examined in isolation (S or T), differences in the distribution of discount rates are statistically insignificant with very small effect sizes; by contrast, clear interactions emerge in the S×T space: some configurations (e.g., large packages with moderate duration) exhibit higher discounts, whereas others (e.g., small packages with long duration) display lower discounts. Based on these estimates, we develop S×T reference tables that classify observed discounts into “low-typical-high” states consistent with the package configuration. The resulting percentile benchmarks by scale × duration provide owners with an objective basis for evaluation and anomaly detection in discount levels, while offering contractors a market reference to optimize bidding strategies by package configuration, balance risk-return, and position competitive capability.

References

  1. OECD, "Government at a Glance 2019," https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/government-at-a-glance-2019_8ccf5c38-en.html, Paris, 2019.
  2. W. Bank, "Procurement Framework," https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/project-procurement/framework, Washington, 2016.
  3. Q. h. V. Nam, "Luật Đấu thầu 2023 (Luật số 22/2023/QH15)," Nxb. Chính trị Quốc gia, Hà Nội, 2023.
  4. OECD, "Fighting Bid Rigging in Public Procurement," Available: https://www.oecd.org/competition/fighting-bid-rigging-in-public-procurement.htm, Paris, 2025.
  5. OECD, "Fighting Bid Rigging in Public Procurement.," [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/competition/fighting-bid-rigging-in-public-procurement.htm, Paris, 2021.
  6. P. E. Eriksson Mats, M. Westerberg, "Effects of Cooperative Procurement Procedures on Construction Project Performance: A Conceptual Framework," International Journal of Project Management, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 197-208, 2011.
  7. A. M. Alsugair et al., "Forecasting the Final Contract Cost on the Basis of the Owner’s Cost Estimation Using an Artificial Neural Network," Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Construction and Infrastructure Management, vol. 13, no. 3, 2023.
  8. M. Li et al. , "Forecasting Ratio of Low Bid to Owner's Estimate for Highway Construction," Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 147, no. 1, 2020.
  9. F. M. Tehrani, "Engineer’s estimate reliability and statisticalcharacteristics of bids," Civil & Environmental Engineering | Short Communication, vol. 3, no. 1, 2016.
  10. W. S. J. T. Committee, "Project Delivery and Innovative Practices Study of WSDOT," Washington State Joint Transportation Committee , Washington, 2025.
  11. S. M. J. W. Delaney, "The Effect Of The Level Of Competition On Construction Bid Quality," Construction Management Association of America, 2016.
  12. H. Liu et al., "Competitive Bidding in Construction Contracting," Western Michigan University, Michigan, 2022.
  13. T. t. Đ. t. q. m. q. g. (VNEPS), "Báo cáo tổng kết công tác năm 2024 và triển khai nhiệm vụ năm 2025 của Bộ Kế hoạch và Đầu tư," Bộ Kế hoạch và Đầu tư, Hà Nội, 2024.
  14. U. T. H. C. Minh, "Công văn 459/UBND-DA về đẩy mạnh triển khai đấu thầu qua mạng giai đoạn 2022–2025," UBND TP. Hồ Chí Minh, Hồ Chí Minh, 2022.
  15. H. A. Pham et al., "Đấu Thầu Qua Mạng Trong Lĩnh Vực Xây Dựng:Phân Tích Tổng Quan Về Lợi Ích Và Thách Thức," in Hội thảo Kinh tế và Quản lý Xây dựng: Kết nối – Đổi mới – Phát triển, Hà Nội, 2023.
  16. Y. Dodge, Exploratory Data Analysis. In: The Concise Encyclopedia of Statistics, New York: Springer, 2008.
  17. A. D. B. (ADB), "User’s Guide: Procurement of Works (Large Civil Works)," Available: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/procurement-large-works-guide.pdf, Manila, 2018.
  18. T. International, "Corruption in Public Procurement: Risks and Reform Policies.," Transparency International, Available: https://www.transparency.org, Berlin, 2020.
  19. U. N. D. P. (UNDP), "Public Procurement as a Tool for Sustainable Development," Available: https://www.undp.org, New York, 2022.
  20. M. N. M. Salman, "Effects of bidding on the success of construction project," in 1st International Conference on Advances in Civil & EnvironmentalEngineering, University of Engineering & Technology Taxila, Taxila, Pakistan, 2022.
  21. W. C. Watanabea et al., "The impact of triple constraints on the project success, a moderating role of organizational support," Journal of Project Management , vol. 9, pp. 73-84, 2024.
  22. P. H. Nguyễn, "Các nhân tố tác động đến tỷ lệ giảm giá trong," Science & Technology Development, vol. 20, no. 3, 2017.
  23. B.V. Phạm, "Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến giá dự thầu trong xây dựng," Tạp chí xây dựng, vol. 01, pp. 122-128, 2022.
  24. t. O. o. G. a. P. Affairs, "A More Systematic Approach Is Needed To Identify Potential Anticompetitive Bidding in Federal-Aid Highway Projects," U.S. Department of Transportation, 2025.