ISSN:
Website: www.jomc.vn
Risk analysis of affecting costs implementation of investment projects on sustainable development
Abstract
Although there is ample evidence that sustainable building practices bring many environmental, economic and social benefits. But many construction practitioners did not support the implementation of Green Building projects because the initial investment cost is higher when compared with the practice with traditional construction. Therefore, risk factors that increase costs that are believed to be important barriers to the practice of “green” projects must be identified. This study contributes to the identification, analysis and assessment of risk factors affecting the cost of implementing construction investment projects towards sustainable development. If not well controlled, it can over budget, incur costs and reduce profits and project efficiency. A study was conducted with leading experts in the field. Based on the results of data analysis of 172 survey panels along with direct interviews with 10 experts, 31 factors have been identified, classified into 6 groups of factors contributing to the cost difference.Including:"Design",“GreenBuilding Fee”,“Materials”, “Environment – Society”, “Project Management” and “Legal – Contract”. Research results show that in order to achieve sustainable development, in addition to the construction cost components that directly affect the total project cost, such as complex design, poor quality green materials, management process, etc. Inefficient project and project construction, the additional tasks of "Green Building Fee" such as expert consultation fee, registration fee for green standard certification, insurance fee also affect the cost of the project. If not well managed right from the design concept to construction, handover and operation of the project.
References
- N. Z. M. Azizi, N. Z. Abidin, and A. Raofuddin, "Soft Cost Elements in Green Projects: Malaysian building industry," Asian Journal of Behavioural Studies, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 135-146, 2018.
- B.-G. Hwang, L. Zhu, Y. Wang, and X. Cheong, "Green building construction projects in Singapore: cost premiums and cost performance," Project management journal, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 67-79, 2017.
- C. T. T. Đ. T. B. X. DỰNG, "Phân tích đánh giá mức độ ảnh hưởng của các yếu tố chi phí tới suất vốn đầu tư xây dựng công trình theo các tiêu chí công trình xanh," Tạo chí Kinh tế Xây dựng, vol. Số 3, 2021.
- W. Taemthong and N. Chaisaard, "An analysis of green building costs using a minimum cost concept," Journal of Green Building, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 53-78, 2019.
- N.D. Hưng và Đ.H.N. Quang, "Đánh giá rủi ro trong quá trình thực hiện các dự án xây dụng Công trình xanh tại Việt Nam," Tạp chí Xây Dựng, 2021.
- M. Hu and M. Skibniewski, "Green building construction cost surcharge: An overview," Journal of architectural engineering, vol. 27, no. 4, p. 04021034, 2021.
- Hoàng Trọng và Chu Nguyễn Mộng Ngọc (2008). Phân tích dữ liệu nghiên cứu với SPSS, Nhà xuất bản Hồng Đức, Đại học Kinh tế Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Tập 1 và Tập 2.
- Nunnally, J.C. & Bernstein, I.H, Lý thuyết tâm lý học, 3rd ed. New York, NXB McGraw Hill, 1994.
- N. M. Russ, M. Hamid, and K. M. Ye, "Literature review on green cost premium elements of sustainable building construction," Architecture, vol. 9, no. 8, 2018.
- A. S. Weerasinghe, T. Ramachandra, and N. Thurairajah, "Life cycle cost analysis: Green vs conventional buildings in Sri Lanka," in Proceeding of the 33rd Annual ARCOM Conference, 2017, vol. 4, p. 6.
- Nguyễn Đình Thọ, Phương pháp nghiên cứu khoa học trong kinh doanh, Nhà xuất bản Tài chính, 2016.
- Samuel B.Green, Neil J.Salkin, Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh. Analyzing and Understanding Data, 4th Edition, 2005.
- Andy Field, Discovering Statistic Using SPSS, 3rd Edition, 2009.
- T. Subramani, P. S Sruthi, ‘Causes of cost overrun in construction’, IOSR Journal of Engineering, vol. 04, Issue June, 2014.
- Hair & ctg, Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th Edition, 2009.

